Re: (IAAC) rating transparency with naked eye

>I will certainly take a look at your page, later this week.
>Trying to catch up with email right now.
I have made the announcement before installing the page so that is why some
of you had "error 404" while trying to reach it. But now the problem is
solved as I have checked it.
>I use the width and brightness of the Milky Way and just
>a general impression to rate the transparency of the night.
>Not very scientific, but I do have a consistent (my eye)
>rating over the years.
Well, I believe this method to be more valuable concerning deep sky
observing because its reference is a nebulous object. With the limiting
magnitude estimate, the rating seems to "permitting" for I have had
experiences of quite similar LM (at about 6) and still different viewing
conditions on DS objects: haze seems to leave naked eye stars quite
unimpressed and are devastating for faint fuzzies.
>Clear Skies (what does that mean?)
>Steve Coe
Well, for me, it means "enough transparent to show natural skyglow".
So, clear skies to all, yann.
Yann Pothier
11 impasse Canart, 75012 PARIS, FRANCE
To UNSUBSCRIBE from the 'netastrocatalog' lists, use the Web form at: